The trouble with Ostarine: Jimmy Wallhead’s
16th March 2018
USADA announced today that Grace Ariola, of Bloomington, Ill., an athlete in the sport of swimming, has tested positive for a prohibited substance, which was determined to have been ingested by her without fault or negligence. As a result, Ariola will not face a period of ineligibility for her positive test, and because the sample was collected out-of-competition, there are no competitive results to disqualify.
Ariola, 18, tested positive for hydrochlorothiazide as the result of an out-of-competition urine sample she provided on June 19, 2018. Hydrochlorothiazide is a Specified Substance in the class of Diuretics and Masking Agents and prohibited at all times under the USADA Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing, the United States Olympic Committee National Anti-Doping Policies, and the Fédération Internationale de Natation (FINA) Anti-Doping Rules, all of which have adopted the World Anti-Doping Code and the World Anti-Doping Agency Prohibited List.
During USADA’s investigation into the circumstances of her case, Ariola provided USADA with records for a permitted oral prescription medication she was taking at the time of her positive test. This permitted medication did not list hydrochlorothiazide on the label or any other prohibited substances. However, detailed laboratory analysis subsequently conducted on the athlete’s medication tablets, as well as the same brand and dose of tablets independently sourced, confirmed hydrochlorothiazide trace contamination.
“While the rules require this to be publicly announced, we strongly believe this case, and others like it, should be considered no violation,” said Travis T. Tygart, Chief Executive Officer for USADA. “We will continue to advocate in the WADA Code review process that where no fault or negligence has occurred, an athlete should not face any violation or unnecessary public attention.”
• This media release was published by the US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) on 28 September 2018. Click here for the original.
Just four athletes competing in four sports, from two countries, were involved in anti-doping proceedings...
Twenty nine athletes from ten counties, competing in 13 sports, were involved in anti-doping proceedings...
Eight athletes from eight countries, competing in seven sports, were involved in anti-doping proceedings that...