The trouble with Ostarine: Jimmy Wallhead’s
16th March 2018
The Adjudicatory Chamber of the independent Ethics Committee chaired by Mr Hans-Joachim Eckert has today notified Mr Harold Mayne-Nicholls of the grounds of the decision against him. The Adjudicatory Chamber had decided to ban Mr Mayne-Nicholls from taking part in any kind of football-related activity at national and international level (administrative, sports or any other) for a period of seven years.
Mr Mayne-Nicholls was found guilty of infringing Article 13 (General rules of conduct), Article 15 (Loyalty), Article 19 (Conflicts of interest) and Article 20 (Offering and accepting gifts and other benefits) of the FIFA Code of Ethics (FCE). As established by the adjudicatory chamber, the most serious breach committed by the official was the violation of Article 20 of the FCE on offering and accepting gifts and other benefits. This provision aims at guaranteeing that the requirement for FIFA – and its bodies and officials – to behave with integrity and neutrality is upheld at all times.
Mr Mayne-Nicholls, in his capacity as chairman of the FIFA Bid Evaluation Group for the World Cups in 2018 and 2022, had a special obligation with regard to the integrity and neutrality of his work. Confidence in the work of the Bid Evaluation Group was especially crucial in order for it to properly exercise its powers and duties. After having taken part in an inspection visit to one of the Bid Committees in September 2010, Mr Mayne-Nicholls, at his own initiative, repeatedly asked for personal favours related to the hosting and training of his relatives (a son, nephew and brother-in-law) at an institution linked with that Bid Committee. Not only were these requests of a private nature, but they were made only a few days after the visit to the Bid Committee, during the time the Bid Evaluation Group of which Mr Mayne-Nicholls was the chairman was still exercising its duties and prior to the election of the hosts for the 2018 and 2022 FIFA World Cups™.
By making the requests, Mr Mayne-Nicholls did not act in FIFA’s interests and ignored his responsibility as a high-ranking FIFA official, someone who was expected to act with utmost neutrality and integrity, in order to pursue his own personal interests. After receiving the grounds of the decision, Mr Mayne-Nicholls may lodge an appeal with the FIFA Appeal Committee.
• This media release was originally published by the FIFA Ethics Committee on 14 January 2016. To access the original, please click here.
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has issued its decision in the appeal filed...