Demonising Justin Gatlin
13th September 2015
A further publication of data illegally obtained from the World Anti-Doping Agency’s (WADA) Anti-Doping Administration and Management System (ADAMS) has taken the total number of athletes affected to 107 from 23 countries, competing in 25 sports. The latest publication on the Fancy Bears internet site involves Therapeutic Use Exemptions (TUEs) relating to 41 athletes from 13 countries and 17 sports. It involves seven athletes from both Canada and the US; six from the UK; five from Italy; four from Australia; two from Denmark, Germany, Serbia and Switzerland; and one from Croatia, Japan, South Africa and Sweden.
‘The incident response team that we have assembled is actively working with law enforcement agencies in Canada and elsewhere, and acting on the intelligence obtained through our investigations to prevent any further intrusions’, read a WADA statement. ‘We are also consulting with leading cyber security experts to ensure that no further information is accessed from the broader ADAMS’.
As with the statement issued after last Friday’s hack, today’s statement dropped earlier assertions that a Russian ‘cyber espionage’ group known as Tsar Team (APT28) is behind the attacks. However, a warning statement on the ADAMS website still asserts that Russia is behind the attacks. There is more information on how this group is thought to operate in this Recorded Future post.
As with previous Fancy Bears hacks, there is no evidence that any of the TUEs related to anything other than a genuine medical need. They all involve asthma drugs, ADHD drugs, corticosteroids or anti-inflammatory drugs such as prednisolone. Some appear to involve painkillers used during medical treatment.
As previously stated by WADA, today’s statement reiterated that the activities of the hackers appear to be confined to athletes competing at the Rio 2016 Olympics. While there is no suggestion of any wrongdoing, the apparent widespread use of TUEs at the Rio 2016 Olympics will continue to raise questions as to whether the system needs reform, especially given the apparent gulf between elite and amateur athletes in ease of obtaining a TUE.
WADA recently explained a 48% increase in TUEs between 2014 and 2016 as being the result of a May 2016 WADA Foundation Board decision to ‘reinforce the mandatory requirement’ for all TUEs to be entered into ADAMS, as well as being due to ‘the effect of the Rio 2016 Olympics and Paralympics’. As well as making it impossible to ascertain as to whether there has been an increase in TUEs, this statement raises other questions. If the mandatory requirement to enter TUEs into ADAMS was not being enforced before May 2016, who was monitoring whether TUEs were being correctly granted? Did concern that TUEs were being abused prompt WADA to ‘reinforce’ its requirement that all TUEs are entered into ADAMS?
‘In the cases of all four athletes named today, this process determined that their medication use was both necessary for their health and would not give performance enhancing benefits’, read an emailed statement from the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) in relation to the four Australian athletes identified through illegally published TUEs. ‘ASADA again condemns the malicious attacks. The leaks are a poor attempt to discredit these athletes and do not show any wrong doing. Certainly, such exemptions do not constitute doping.’
Anti-Doping Denmark (ADD), which as the table above shows has had six athletes affected through their TUEs being published, highlighted that it approved less than half the TUEs applied for during 2015. It said that a total of nine Danish athletes had TUEs at the Rio 2016 Olympics. The largest group of TUEs were for beta-2 agonists for asthma treatment (41); glucocorticoids to treat allergies and inflammation (17) and stimulants to treat Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD – 15).
‘In 2015 ADD issued 93 TUEs from 207 applied for’, read a statement. ‘And out of the 93 TUEs, some were sought for treatments that are already permitted under the Prohibited List. Some TUEs were granted for a short period (e.g for inflammation), whilst others can last for up to eight years (for the treatment of chronic illnesses, such as diabetes).’
As previously reported by The Sports Integrity Initiative, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada is awaiting a response from WADA about whether it had adequate systems in place to protect confidential athlete data. “Under Canada’s Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act [PIPEDA], which applies to WADA, the sensitivity of information is a specific factor to consider in looking at the adequacy of an organisation’s safeguards”, said a spokesperson. As previously reported, ADAMS is due to be replaced at the end of this year.
Read other articles from this story stream...
The IOC Disciplinary Commission recently issued its decisions (operative part) in the cases against Cross-Country...