Demonising Justin Gatlin
13th September 2015
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has issued its decision in the arbitration procedure between Harold Mayne-Nicholls and the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA). The decision of the FIFA Appeal Committee dated 22 April 2016 is set aside and replaced by the following decision:
Consequently, Harold Mayne-Nicholls’s ban from taking part in any football-related activity at national and international level has been served in its entirety.
Harold Mayne-Nicholls, the former President of the Chilean Football Association and former Chairman of the FIFA Evaluation Group for the 2018 and 2022 FIFA World Cup bids, was investigated by the FIFA Ethics Committee for breaches of the FIFA Ethics Code arising from requests he made to an organisation linked to the Qatari bid team for the 2022 World Cup on behalf of members of his family and athletes from Chile. On 6 July 2015, the FIFA Ethics Committee issued a decision in which Harold Mayne-Nicholls was banned from participating in any football-related activity at national and international level for seven years.
Harold Mayne-Nicholls appealed this decision to the FIFA Appeal Committee (FIFA AC) which issued a decision on 22 April 2016 reducing the ban from participating in any football-related activity at national and international level from seven years to three years. The written grounds for the decision were notified on 8 February 2017. On 27 February 2017, Harold Mayne-Nicholls filed an appeal at CAS against the FIFA AC decision. The CAS arbitration was conducted by Prof. Dr. Martin Schimke, Germany (President), Mr Bernard Hanotiau, Belgium, and Prof. Luigi Fumagalli, Italy. The Panel held a hearing with the parties at the CAS Headquarters in Lausanne, Switzerland on 14 June 2017.
In its decision, the CAS Panel confirmed the finding in the FIFA AC decision that Harold Mayne- Nicholls was guilty of violating Articles 13 (General rule of conduct), 15 (Loyalty) and 19 (Conflict of interests) of the FIFA Code of Ethics 2012. However, it did not confirm the violation of Article 20 (Offering and accepting gifts and other benefits). Having given careful and anxious consideration to the nature of the wrongdoing that Mr Harold Mayne Nicholls has been found guilty of, the Panel concluded that a two-year prohibition on participating in any football-related activity represented an appropriate and proportionate penalty.
• This media release was originally published by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) on 14 July 2017. To access the original, please click here.
Papa Massata Diack, son of former International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) President Lamine Diack...
Concerns about adverse human rights impacts related to FIFA’s activities have intensified ever since its...